Well, as Steve said, that Apple would be open to open outside ad networks, it just happened through new developer license agreement but it have different terms at different levels.
Apple’s last license agreement released in April states that they’d block all outside / third-party ad networks from selling “in-app” ads on it’s devices by muting their ability to track user data in absence of any clarification from Apple.
Steve at D8 Conference said like, Apple wasn’t interested in banning rivals to its iAd platform but just wanted to cripple third-party analytics companies like Flurry.
The following is the part of the legal, talks about the Ad.
3.3.9 You and Your Applications may not collect, use, or disclose to any third party, user or device data without prior user consent, and then only under the following conditions:
- The collection, use or disclosure is necessary in order to provide a service or function that is directly relevant to the use of the Application. For example, without Apple’s prior written consent, You may not use third party analytics software in Your Application to collect and send device data to a third party for aggregation, processing, or analysis.
- The collection, use or disclosure is for the purpose of serving advertising to Your Application; is provided to an independent advertising service provider whose primary business is serving mobile ads (for example, an advertising service provider owned by or affiliated with a developer or distributor of mobile devices, mobile operating systems or development environments other than Apple would not qualify as independent); and the disclosure is limited to UDID, user location data, and other data specifically designated by Apple as available for advertising purposes.
This reflects almost the same as what Steve said at D8 conference but little beyond that, it states “for example, an advertising service provider owned by or affiliated with a developer or distributor of mobile devices, mobile operating systems or development environments other than Apple would not qualify as independent” So, Google well suits here as it qualifies, as a developer and distributor of mobile devices. Other than that its simple to guess and very obvious as well, if Microsoft entered in advertising market for mobile devices, they would not qualify either.
One good thing is that the smaller companies like Greystripe, Millenial Media and Medialets can still can get their ads built into apps developed by any iPhone developer as it is happening right now. If these requires user data to target proper ad, they can only get it through the permission of the Apple and the user of device.
Tags: iAD, License Agreement